[摘 要] 评价《中国针灸》杂志中随机临床试验(rct)报告的质量。 手工检索2000—2006 年《中国针灸》，筛选rct文章，并对其采用《针灸随机临床试验报告资料提取表》进行质量评估。 共纳入686篇rct文章，其方法学质量和国际标准相比有较大差距。仅有1篇rct对试验流程进行描述；对其他影响rct报告质量的内容报告也较少，如医师资历(3.06%)、不良反应(4.23%)、盲法(5.98%)、随访(14.43%)。结果表明针灸rct在试验设计、实施过程和报告方面有待改进。
critical appraisal of randomized clinical trials in chinese acupuncture and moxibustion from 2000 to 2006
geng ling-ling1，lin ren-sheng1，sun xia-yun1，wu li1，zhong ming-ming1，zhao bin1，zheng jun1，director： liu jian-ping2 (1.faculty of humanity and social sciences，2.college of basic medicine，beijing university of cm，beijing 100029，china)
abstract：to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials (rcts) published in chinese acupuncture and moxibustion.manually retrieve rct papers published in chinese acupuncture and moxibustion from 2000 to 2006 and use "the extraction form of acupuncture and moxibustion randomized clinical trial report data" to evaluate the quality of rcts.six hundred and eighty-six rcts were enrolled.the methodological quality was lower than the international standard and only one rct paper described the trial technological process.and there were a less reports about influencing rct quality，such as acupuncturist′s qualification and education background (3.06%)，adverse reaction (4.23%)，blind method (5.98%) and follow-up (14.43%).rcts on acupuncture and moxibustion published in chinese acupuncture and moxibustion need to be improved in trial design，conduction and report.
key words：randomized controlled trials；periodicals/statist；acup mox science；@chinese acupuncture and moxibustion