［摘 要］ 目的：探讨最佳治疗方法，提高临床疗效并探讨其机制。方法：采用担截法治疗中风132例，并与传统取穴风池、肩、曲池等44例作对照研究。两组均经20天治疗，观察血液流变学、脑血流、神经系统体征变化。结果：担截法与传统取穴疗效差异无显著意义，P>0.05。结论：担截法与传统取穴治疗中风疗效相同。
Clinical Study on the Danjie Method (Double-Single Acupoint Selection) for
Treatment of Ischemic Apoplexy
Cao Dai, Zhao Hui, Jiang Zhongyue, et al. (1. Department of
Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Shenyang Municipal Institute of TCM, Liaoning
Province 110004, China; 2. Shenyang Municipal Third Peoples Hospital)
［Abstract］ Purpose To explore the best therapy of ischemic apoplexy.
Methods 132 cases were treated with the Danjie method and 44 cases were treated
with traditional acupoints Fengchi (GB 20), Jianyu (LI 15) and Quchi (LI 11) as
control group. The both groups were treated for 20 days and then the changes of
blood rheology, cerebral blood flow and signs of the nervous system were observed.
Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in the
therapeutic effect, P>0.05. Conclusion Both the Danjie method and traditional
point selection method have a similar therapeutic effect on apoplexy.
［Key words］ Cerebral Embolism and Thrombosis/acup ther; Acupuncture Points;